From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Capehart

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 10, 2010
394 F. App'x 980 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-6399.

Submitted: August 16, 2010.

Decided: September 10, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:06-cr-00113-RAJ-FBS-1).

Dana Amile Capehart, Appellant Pro Se. Sherrie Scott Capotosto, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Dana Amile Capehart appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Capehart, No. 2:06-cr-00113-RAJ-FBS-1 (E.D.Va. Feb. 26, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Capehart

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 10, 2010
394 F. App'x 980 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Capehart

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dana Amile CAPEHART…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Sep 10, 2010

Citations

394 F. App'x 980 (4th Cir. 2010)