From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Canada

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jul 20, 2009
Criminal Action No. 05-cr-00277-WDM (D. Colo. Jul. 20, 2009)

Opinion

Criminal Action No. 05-cr-00277-WDM.

July 20, 2009


ORDER


This matter is before me on the Defendant's Motion to Return Not Seized Property (doc. no. 62). Defendant alleges that the money seized from him and ordered by me to be applied to the restitution Defendant owes has not been paid toward restitution.

Defendant has been represented in this matter by counsel, Elizabeth P. Castle. I do not allow hybrid representation and therefore will not consider this motion. This order will be without prejudice to counsel seeking any appropriate relief.

Accordingly, it is ordered that Defendant's motion (doc. no. 62) be stricken.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Canada

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jul 20, 2009
Criminal Action No. 05-cr-00277-WDM (D. Colo. Jul. 20, 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Canada

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD LEE CANADA, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jul 20, 2009

Citations

Criminal Action No. 05-cr-00277-WDM (D. Colo. Jul. 20, 2009)