From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Cameron

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 18, 2008
264 F. App'x 569 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-30173.

Submitted January 14, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed January 18, 2008.

Kirk A. Engdall, Esq., United States Attorney's Office, Eugene, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Kelly Beckley, Esq., Attorney at Law, Eugene, OR, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Ann L. Aiken, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-02-60099-AA.

Before: HALL, O'SCANNLAIN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Robert Allen Cameron appeals from the 188-month sentence imposed following a conviction for two counts of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Cameron contends that the district court erred by ordering his federal sentence to run consecutively to his state sentence. In particular, he contends that the consecutive sentence violates the underlying principle of U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3. We reject this contention. We conclude that the district court adequately considered U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(c), and 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). See United States v. Dowd, 417 F.3d 1080, 1089 (9th Cir. 2005); United States v. Fifield, 432 F.3d 1056, 1063-66 (9th Cir. 2005).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Cameron

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 18, 2008
264 F. App'x 569 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Cameron

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Allen CAMERON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 18, 2008

Citations

264 F. App'x 569 (9th Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

Cameron v. United States

Robert Allen CAMERON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.Case below, 264 Fed.Appx. 569. *2519 Petition for writ of…