From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Camarena

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 12, 2010
365 F. App'x 556 (5th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-50225 Conference Calendar.

February 12, 2010.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Steven Gregory White, Naman, Howell, Smith Lee, Waco, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, USDC No. 6:07-CR-158-4.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.


The attorney appointed to represent Miguel Camarena has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Camarena has filed a response. To the extent that he raises a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration of the claim at this time; such a claim generally "cannot be resolved on direct appeal when [it] has not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations." United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Our independent review of the record, counsel's brief, and Camarena's response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2


Summaries of

U.S. v. Camarena

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 12, 2010
365 F. App'x 556 (5th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Camarena

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Miguel CAMARENA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Feb 12, 2010

Citations

365 F. App'x 556 (5th Cir. 2010)