From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. CAL

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga
Mar 15, 2011
CASE NO. 1:10-CR-154 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 15, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:10-CR-154.

March 15, 2011


ORDER


On February 23, 2011, Magistrate Judge William B. Mitchell Carter filed a Report and Recommendation recommending (a) the Court accept Defendant's plea of guilty to Counts Six and Eight of the Indictment in exchange for the undertakings made by the government in the written plea agreement; (b) the Court adjudicate Defendant guilty of the charges set forth in Counts Six and Eight of the Indictment; (c) that a decision on whether to accept the plea agreement be deferred until sentencing; and (d) Defendant shall remain in custody pending sentencing in this matter (Court File No. 18). Neither party filed an objection within the given fourteen days. After reviewing the record, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the magistrate judge's report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and ORDERS as follows:

(1) Defendant's plea of guilty to Counts Six and Eight of the Indictment, in exchange for the undertakings made by the government in the written plea agreement, is ACCEPTED;

(2) Defendant is hereby ADJUDGED guilty of the charges set forth in Counts Six and Eight of the Indictment;

(3) A decision on whether to accept the plea agreement is DEFERRED until sentencing; and

(4) Defendant SHALL REMAIN IN CUSTODY pending sentencing on Thursday, June 9, 2011, at 9:00 am.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. CAL

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga
Mar 15, 2011
CASE NO. 1:10-CR-154 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 15, 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. CAL

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DONNELL LYNN CAL

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga

Date published: Mar 15, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 1:10-CR-154 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 15, 2011)