U.S. v. Cabrera

Full title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ARNALDO CABRERA

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Winchester

Date published: May 11, 2011

Case No. 4:06-cr-26 (E.D. Tenn. May. 11, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 4:06-cr-26.

May 11, 2011

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WILLIAM CARTER, Magistrate Judge

The defendant appeared for a hearing before the undersigned on May 11, 2011, in accordance with Rule 32.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure on the Petition for Warrant for Offender Under Supervision of U.S. Probation Officer Danny Haimelin and the Warrant for Arrest issued by U.S. District Judge Harry S. Mattice, Jr. Those present for the hearing included:

(1) AUSA James Brooks for the USA.

(2) The defendant ARNALDO CABRERA.

(3) Attorney Mary Ellen Coleman for defendant.

(4) Deputy Clerk Kelli Jones.

After being sworn in due form of law the defendant was informed or reminded of his privilege against self-incrimination accorded him under the 5th Amendment to the United States Constitution.

It was determined the defendant wished to be represented by an attorney and he qualified for the appointment of an attorney to represent him at government expense. Attorney Mary Ellen Coleman of Federal Defender Services was appointed to represent the defendant. It was determined the defendant had been provided with a copy of the Petition for Warrant for Offender Under Supervision and the Warrant for Arrest and had the opportunity of reviewing those documents with counsel. It was also determined the defendant was capable of being able to read and understand the copy of the aforesaid documents he had been provided.

Defendant waived his right to a preliminary hearing and detention hearing.

AUSA Brooks moved defendant be detained without bail pending his revocation hearing before U.S. District Judge Harry S. Mattice, Jr.

Findings

(1) Based upon U.S. Probation Officer Danny Haimelin's petition and defendant's waiver of preliminary hearing and detention hearing, the undersigned finds there is probable cause to believe defendant has committed violations of his conditions of supervised release as alleged in the petition.

Conclusions

It is ORDERED:

(1) The defendant shall be appear in a revocation hearing before U.S. District Judge Harry S. Mattice, Jr.

(2) The motion of AUSA Brooks that defendant be DETAINED WITHOUT BAIL pending his revocation hearing before Judge Mattice is GRANTED.

(3) The U.S. Marshal shall transport defendant to a revocation hearing before Judge Mattice on Monday, May 16, 2011, at 9:00 am.

ENTER.