From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bury

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 23, 2006
Case No. CR-F-05-0435 OWW (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. CR-F-05-0435 OWW.

February 23, 2006

DALE A. BLICKENSTAFF #40681, Attorney at Law, Fresno, California, Attorney for Defendant, SUSAN LYNN BURY.

KAREN A. ESCOBAR Assistant U.S. Attorney.


STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTIONS SCHEDULE


The parties hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

1. To continue the due date for defense Motions, currently scheduled for February 27, 2006, to a new date of March 10, 2006;

2. The due date for the government's Responses to Motions currently scheduled for March 20, 2006, remains the same; and

3. The hearing date on Motions currently set for March 27, 2006, remains the same.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the new due date for defense Motions is March 10, 2006. The due date for the government's Responses to Motions remains the same (March 20, 2006); and the hearing date on Motions remains the same (March 27, 2006).

Time is excluded pursuant to 18 USC 3161.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Bury

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 23, 2006
Case No. CR-F-05-0435 OWW (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2006)
Case details for

United States v. Bury

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SUSAN LYNN BURY, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 23, 2006

Citations

Case No. CR-F-05-0435 OWW (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2006)