From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Burtin

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Dec 18, 2007
No. 07-10111-01-WEB (D. Kan. Dec. 18, 2007)

Opinion

No. 07-10111-01-WEB.

December 18, 2007


Memorandum and Order


This matter came before the court on the defendant's objection to the Presentence Report. The court ruled orally on the objection at the sentencing hearing of December 17, 2007. This written memorandum will supplement the court's oral ruling.

Defendant's sole objection concerns an additional 8.58 grams of methamphetamine for which he was found responsible under the relevant conduct provisions of the guidelines. See USSG § 1B1.3. The methamphetamine was discovered during a traffic stop on March 2, 2007. (PSR ¶¶ 29-33). Defendant denies that he possessed this substance or that he is responsible for it. Although the Government contends the circumstances of the stop show that the methamphetamine was in the defendant's possession, the court has no evidentiary basis to make such a finding. Accordingly, the court will sustain the objection. As the defendant concedes, however, this ruling does not effect the offense level or the advisory guideline range applicable to his offenses. Conclusion .

Defendant's objection to the Presentence Report is SUSTAINED. The Probation Officer in charge of this case shall see that a copy of this order is appended to any copy of the Presentence Report made available to the Bureau of Prisons. IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Burtin

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Dec 18, 2007
No. 07-10111-01-WEB (D. Kan. Dec. 18, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Burtin

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALEXANDER L. BURTIN, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: Dec 18, 2007

Citations

No. 07-10111-01-WEB (D. Kan. Dec. 18, 2007)