From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Burrell

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jun 19, 2006
Crim. No. 06-81 (JNE/RLE) (D. Minn. Jun. 19, 2006)

Opinion

Crim. No. 06-81 (JNE/RLE).

June 19, 2006


ORDER


This case is before the Court on a Report and Recommendation issued by the Honorable Raymond L. Erickson, Chief United States Magistrate Judge, on May 10, 2006. The Magistrate Judge recommended that several motions to suppress be denied. Larry Burrell and Tameika Brown objected to the Report and Recommendation. Based on a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Burrell's Motion to Suppress Statements Obtained by Custodial Interrogation [Docket No. 46] is DENIED.
2. Brown's Motion to Suppress Statements [Docket No. 29] is DENIED.
3. Burrell's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained by Search and Seizure [Docket No. 44] is DENIED.
4. Brown's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained by Search and Seizure [Docket No. 30] is DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Burrell

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jun 19, 2006
Crim. No. 06-81 (JNE/RLE) (D. Minn. Jun. 19, 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Burrell

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Larry Eugene Burrell (1) and…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Jun 19, 2006

Citations

Crim. No. 06-81 (JNE/RLE) (D. Minn. Jun. 19, 2006)

Citing Cases

United States v. Accardo-Rainey

Such evidence is not, however, necessary to find that law enforcement securing of a residence was…

United States v. Willard

There was full compliance with the mandate of the Fourth Amendment.”); United States v. Burrell, 2006…