From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Bullock

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 26, 2010
367 F. App'x 462 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-8247.

Submitted: February 18, 2010.

Decided: February 26, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (4:00-cr-00060-JBF-l).

Terence Dewayne Bullock, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Richard Murphy, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Terence Dewayne Bullock appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bullock, No. 4:00-cr-00060-JBF-l (E.D.Va. Dec. 2, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Bullock

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 26, 2010
367 F. App'x 462 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Bullock

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terence Dewayne BULLOCK…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 26, 2010

Citations

367 F. App'x 462 (4th Cir. 2010)