From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Bullchild

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 24, 2008
301 F. App'x 681 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 06-30595.

Submitted November 13, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed November 24, 2008.

Joseph E. Thaggard, Esq., USGF — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Great Falls, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Kenneth Michael Bullchild, Atwater, CA, pro se.

Jason T. Holden, Esq., Faure Holden Attorneys at Law, Great. Falls, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana, Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-04-00122-1-SEH.

Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Kenneth Michael Bullchild appeals from his jury-trial conviction and 120-month sentence for assault resulting in serious bodily injury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 113(a)(6) and 1153.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Bullchild's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no arguable grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. The appellant has filed pro se supplemental briefs. No answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-31, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, all pending motions are DENIED, and the judgment is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Bullchild

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 24, 2008
301 F. App'x 681 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Bullchild

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth Michael…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 24, 2008

Citations

301 F. App'x 681 (9th Cir. 2008)