From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Bryan

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga
Jul 3, 2008
Case No. 1:06-cr-71 (E.D. Tenn. Jul. 3, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 1:06-cr-71.

July 3, 2008


ORDER


United States Magistrate Judge Susan K. Lee filed her report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). [Court Doc. 219.] Neither party filed objections within the given 10 days.

After reviewing the record, the Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Lee's report and recommendation. The Court thus ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Lee's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations pursuant to § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b).

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that Defendant's Motion to Suppress [Court Doc. 168] is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Bryan

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga
Jul 3, 2008
Case No. 1:06-cr-71 (E.D. Tenn. Jul. 3, 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Bryan

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. JERRY BRYAN

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga

Date published: Jul 3, 2008

Citations

Case No. 1:06-cr-71 (E.D. Tenn. Jul. 3, 2008)

Citing Cases

SKUL v. U.S.

The Sixth Circuit has held that a failure to comply with Rule 41(f) does not require suppression of evidence.…