From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Brown

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 30, 2008
279 F. App'x 240 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-6277.

Submitted: May 22, 2008.

Decided: May 30, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:98-cr-00120-H-1).

Anthony Leon Brown, Appellant Pro Se. John Howarth Bennett, Office of the United States Attorney, Greenville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.


Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Anthony Leon Brown appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration of its order refusing to compel specific performance of the Government's Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Brown, No. 5:98-cr-00120-H-1 (E.D.N.C. filed Jan. 21, 2008; entered Jan. 23, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Because Brown's motion for reconsideration was filed December 5, 2007, see Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988), more than ten days after entry of the underlying order, only the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration is before the court. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e), 60(c); Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(4)(A), 6(a).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Brown

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 30, 2008
279 F. App'x 240 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony Leon BROWN, a/k/a…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: May 30, 2008

Citations

279 F. App'x 240 (4th Cir. 2008)