From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Brock

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 24, 2008
261 F. App'x 530 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-7266.

Submitted: January 17, 2008.

Decided: January 24, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:03-cr-00429-JAB).

Lincoln Monroe Brock, Appellant Pro Se. Randall Stuart Galyon, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Lincoln Monroe Brock appeals the district court's order denying his Fed.R.Crim.Pro. 33 motion for a new trial predicated on newly discovered evidence. We have reviewed the record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Brock's motion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brock, No. 1:03-cr-00429-JAB (M.D.N.C., Aug. 10, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

U.S. v. Brock

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 24, 2008
261 F. App'x 530 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Brock

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lincoln Monroe BROCK…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jan 24, 2008

Citations

261 F. App'x 530 (4th Cir. 2008)