From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Braxton

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 11, 2008
286 F. App'x 48 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-6650.

Submitted: July 31, 2008.

Decided: August 11, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (4:05-cr-00105-F-1).

Kirby Patrick Braxton, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Stephen Aubrey West, Assistant United States Attorneys, Ethan Ainsworth Ontjes, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Kirby Patrick Braxton appeals the district court's order denying his Motion to Modify Payment Schedule. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Braxton, No. 4:05-cr-00105-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Braxton

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 11, 2008
286 F. App'x 48 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Braxton

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kirby Patrick BRAXTON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Aug 11, 2008

Citations

286 F. App'x 48 (4th Cir. 2008)