Opinion
No. 11-6249.
Submitted: June 30, 2011.
Decided: July 6, 2011.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge (5:93-cr-00123-F-3).
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Lee Boyd, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
John Lee Boyd, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his motion to file supplemental objections to the presentence investigation report. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Boyd, No. 5:93-cr-00123-F-3 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 7, 2011). We deny as unnecessary Boyd's motion for a certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED