U.S. v. Bornman

Full title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CHARLES BORNMAN, Appellant

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Mar 6, 2009

No. 07-3447 (3d Cir. Mar. 6, 2009)

Opinion

No. 07-3447.

Argued December 10, 2008.

Opinion Filed March 6, 2009, Dated: May 5, 2009.

On Appeal From the United States District Court For the District of the Virgin Islands; (D.C. Crim. Action No. 03-cr-00127-1), District Judge: Hon. Raymond L. Finch.

Before: FISHER, JORDAN and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:

The Court having concluded that the phrase, "quid pro quo" is utilized in appellants' briefing solely in the context of the argument addressed and resolved in the paragraph of its opinion bridging pages 11 and 12,

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the opinion in this matter filed on March 6, 2009, is hereby amended as follows:

On page 12, the first paragraph of V. Additional Count Two Arguments is deleted in its entirety.

The next paragraph of that section, which now becomes the first paragraph, is amended by adding the following new first sentence:

Bornman makes several additional arguments relating to Count Two which we find without merit.

The second sentence of that paragraph is amended by striking the word "also".