U.S. v. Bolding

2 Citing cases

  1. U.S. v. Weidner, (N.D.Ind. 1988)

    692 F. Supp. 968 (N.D. Ind. 1988)   Cited 3 times

    Even those statistics are over-simplified, because the courts have ruled on varying grounds. United States v. Russell, 685 F. Supp. 1245 (N.D.Ga. 1988); United States v. Diaz, 685 F. Supp. 1213 (S.D.Ala. 1988); United States v. Perez. 685 F. Supp. 990 (W.D.Tex. 1988); United States v. Allen, 685 F. Supp. 827 (N.D.Ala. 1988); United States v. Lopez-Barron, 685 F. Supp. 725 (S.D.Cal. 1988); United States v. Ortega Lopez. 684 F. Supp. 1506 (C.D.Cal. 1988); United States v. Elliott, 684 F. Supp. 1535 (D.Colo. 1988); United States v. Martinez-Ortega, 684 F. Supp. 634 (D.Idaho 1988); United States v. Bolding, 683 F. Supp. 1003 (D.Md. 1988) (en banc); United States v. Molander, 683 F. Supp. 701 (W.D.Wis. 1988); United States v. Tolbert, 682 F. Supp. 1517 (D.Kan. 1988); United States v. Frank, 682 F. Supp. 815 (W.D.Pa. 1988); United States v. Estrada, 680 F. Supp. 1312 (D.Minn. 1988); United States v. Arnold, 678 F. Supp. 1463 (S.D.Cal. 1988).United States v. Richardson, 685 F. Supp. 111 (E.D.N.C. 1988); United States v. Johnson, 682 F. Supp. 1033 (W.D.Mo.), cert. granted sub nom. United States v. Mistretta, ___ U.S. ___, 108 S.Ct. 2818, 100 L.Ed.2d 920 (1988); United States v. Ruiz-Villanueva, 680 F. Supp. 1411 (S.D.Cal. 1988); United States v. Chambless, 680 F. Supp. 793 (E.D.La. 1988).

  2. U.S. v. Horton

    685 F. Supp. 1479 (D. Minn. 1988)   Cited 3 times

    E.g., United States v. Lopez, 684 F. Supp. 1506 (C.D.Cal. 1988); United States v. Wilson, 686 F. Supp. 284 (W.D.Okla. 1988); United States v. Bolding, 683 F. Supp. 1003 (D.Md. 1988); United States v. Tolbert, 682 F. Supp. 1517 (D.Kan. 1988); United States v. Estrada, 680 F. Supp. 1312 (D.Minn. 1988); United States v. Frank, 682 F. Supp. 815 (W.D.Pa. 1988); United States v. Smith, 686 F. Supp. 847 (D.Colo. 1988); United States v. Molander, 683 F. Supp. 701 (W.D.Wis. 1988) (oral ruling); United States v. Arnold, 678 F. Supp. 1463 (S.D.Cal. 1988). Other courts have upheld the Act and the guidelines from such challenges, however.