Summary
In Rayburn v. Stewart (9th Cir. 1997) 132 F.3d 40, an unpublished memorandum opinion (reported in full at Rayburn v. Stewart (9th Cir. Dec. 15, 1997, No. 97-35150) 1997 WL 787465, 1997 U.S.App LEXIS 36061), Rayburn, a Washington state prisoner, brought a habeas petition alleging that his parole revocation proceeding lacked minimum due process.
Summary of this case from In re Jonathan V.Opinion
Submitted December 15, 1997.
Editorial Note:
This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA9 Rule 36-3 regarding use of unpublished opinions)
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, No. CR-93-00448-JCC; John C. Coughenour, District Judge, Presiding.
Before: SNEED, LEAVY, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Norberto Bobadilla appeals his guilty plea conviction and 60-month sentence imposed for conspiracy to distribute cocaine and heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B) and 846. Bobadilla's counsel has filed a brief stating that he finds no issues for review and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our examination of counsel's brief and our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), disclose no issues requiring review.
Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm the district court's judgment.
The May 11, 1995 order to show cause is discharged and appellant's motion for substitute counsel is denied.
AFFIRMED.