From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Biggs

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 22, 2007
CIV. NO. S-04-1263 FCD GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2007)

Opinion

CIV. NO. S-04-1263 FCD GGH PS.

August 22, 2007


ORDER


The court is in the process of reviewing the government's motion for summary judgment, and finds that a supplemental declaration is required to respond to questions raised by the motion. It is unclear from the papers exactly what the lineage is to the property upon which the disputed structures stand. For example, the government refers to prior ownership by the Leonards, dating back to 1933, as well as prior ownership by P.D. Vail, dating back to 1974. Although it appears that the Biggs purchased a portion of Vail's mining claim, it also appears that Vail sold part of it to Ed Brounciser and Bep Athanassion. Moreover, no attempt at factual linkage is shown between the Crescent claims owned by Biggs and the "P.D. Vail mining claims." Before the court can decide the government's motion, it will require a supplemental declaration, with supporting documents, setting forth lineage to the mining claims upon which the disputed structures are located.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the government shall file a supplemental declaration within twenty days of this order.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Biggs

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 22, 2007
CIV. NO. S-04-1263 FCD GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Biggs

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; and NINE NAMED FEDERAL EMPLOYEES, Plaintiffs, v…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 22, 2007

Citations

CIV. NO. S-04-1263 FCD GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2007)