From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Biggers

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Sep 15, 2010
2:10-CR-00003 JCM (PAL) (D. Nev. Sep. 15, 2010)

Opinion

2:10-CR-00003 JCM (PAL).

September 15, 2010


ORDER


Presently before the court is the government's motion to reconsider the order denying forfeiture (doc. #70). (Doc. #73). The defendant responded (doc. #75), and the government replied (doc. #77).

"Reconsideration is appropriate if the district court (1) is presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling law." School Dist. No. 1J v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir. 1993); see Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b).

The government fails to present any new law, new facts, or new evidence indicating that any of the circumstances enumerated by the Ninth Circuit are present here warranting reconsideration or any other relief.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the government's motion to reconsider the order denying forfeiture (doc. #73) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.

DATED September 15, 2010.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Biggers

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Sep 15, 2010
2:10-CR-00003 JCM (PAL) (D. Nev. Sep. 15, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Biggers

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER BIGGERS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Sep 15, 2010

Citations

2:10-CR-00003 JCM (PAL) (D. Nev. Sep. 15, 2010)