From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Bennett

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 10, 2007
238 F. App'x 935 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-4929.

Submitted: June 15, 2007.

Decided: July 10, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:04-cr-00315).

Johnny E. Watson, Sr., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, TRAXLER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.


Dismissed in part and affirmed in part by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Terry Jackson Bennett appeals his conviction and 235-month sentence following his guilty plea, pursuant to a plea agreement, to one count of assaulting, resisting or impeding an officer in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 111(a), (b) (West 1999 Supp. 2006), and one count of possession with intent to distribute cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B) (West 1999 Supp. 2006). The Government filed a motion to dismiss based upon the waiver of appellate rights to which Bennett agreed as a part of his plea agreement.

We conclude that Bennett's appellate waiver is valid and encompasses all issues raised on appeal except his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. We have reviewed that claim and determine that it does not "conclusively appear" on the record that counsel was ineffective. See United States v. James, 337 F.3d 387, 391 (4th Cir. 2003). Such a claim is more properly raised in a proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). Accordingly, we grant the Government's motion to dismiss with respect to issues covered by the waiver, deny the motion with respect to the ineffective assistance claim, and affirm as to the ineffective assistance of counsel claim. We also deny Bennett's motion to substitute counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART, AFFIRMED IN PART.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Bennett

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 10, 2007
238 F. App'x 935 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Bennett

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terry Jackson BENNETT…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jul 10, 2007

Citations

238 F. App'x 935 (4th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Bennett v. U.S.

However, the circuit court found that the waiver clause from Petitioner's plea agreement was valid and…

Bennett v. United States

Terry Jackson BENNETT, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.Case below, 238 Fed.Appx. 935. Petition for writ of…