From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Bear

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 23, 2007
221 F. App'x 635 (9th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-30256.

Submitted February 20, 2007.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed February 23, 2007.

Office of the U.S. Attorney, Great Falls, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Anthony R. Gallagher, Esq., Federal Defenders of Montana, Great Falls, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana, Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-00-00115-SEH.

Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Wallace John Bear appeals from the district court's judgment imposing a 24-month sentence following revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand.

The record indicates and the government concedes that the district court incorrectly applied the United States Sentencing Guidelines. The correct Guidelines range for a defendant with a criminal history category of IV and Grade C violations of supervised release is six to twelve months, not eighteen to twenty-four months as stated by the district court. Accordingly, we vacate and remand for resentencing. See United States v. Cantrell, 433 F.3d 1269, 1280 (9th Cir. 2006). Having determined that the sentence must be vacated because the Guidelines calculation was incorrect, we decline to address the other contention(s) raised by Bear on appeal.

VACATED and REMANDED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Bear

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 23, 2007
221 F. App'x 635 (9th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Bear

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wallace John BEAR…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 23, 2007

Citations

221 F. App'x 635 (9th Cir. 2007)