U.S. v. Barnett

Full title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Damon Barnett

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 1, 2005

Docket Number: 1:94CR05141-01 REC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2005)

Opinion

Docket Number: 1:94CR05141-01 REC.

September 1, 2005

ROBERT COYLE, Senior District Judge

LEGAL HISTORY:

On January 30, 1995, the above named was placed on supervised release for a term of 3 years, which commenced on March 7, 2003. Special conditions included a requirement that he submit to search and seizure, participate in a correctional treatment program to obtain assistance for drug or alcohol abuse, make restitution payments, and abstain from the use of alcohol. Furthermore, the defendant was ordered to pay restitution in the amount of $6,376 and a special assessment of $200.

SUMMARY OF COMPLIANCE:

The defendant has complied with all conditions and special conditions of supervision and has not been involved in any further criminal activities. Furthermore, it should be noted the defendant has been gainfully employed since his release on supervision and has paid his restitution and special assessment in full. It is the opinion of the Probation Officer that he has derived the maximum benefit from supervision and is not in need of continued supervision.

RECOMMENDATION:

It is, therefore, respectfully recommended that the defendant in this case be terminated early.

Submitted by: Date: September 1, 2005 Tim Mechem United States Probation Officer Fresno, California.

Approved by:

Bruce A. Vasquez Supervising United States Probation Officer.

On January 30, 1995, the above named was placed on probation for a term of 3 years, which commenced on March 7, 2003. Special conditions included a requirement that he submit to search and seizure, participate in a correctional treatment program to obtain assistance for drug or alcohol abuse, make restitution payments, and abstain from alcohol use. Furthermore, the defendant was ordered to pay restitution in the amount of $6,376 and a special assessment of $200.

The defendant has complied with all conditions and special conditions of supervision and has not been involved in any further criminal activities. Furthermore, it should be noted the defendant has been gainfully employed since his release on supervision and has paid his restitution and special assessment in full. It is the opinion of the Probation Officer that he has derived the maximum benefit from supervision and is not in need of continued supervision.

It is ordered that the defendant be discharged from probation and that the proceedings in the case be terminated.