From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Austin

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Mar 4, 2008
No. 07 C 7196 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 4, 2008)

Opinion

No. 07 C 7196.

March 4, 2008


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This Court's January 25, 2008 memorandum order ("Order") requires correction — not in connection with its determination that no certificate of appealability should issue (the principal focus of the Order), but rather in its mistaken application of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) to the appeal by Xavier Edwards ("Edwards"). In the latter respect, Martin v. United States, 96 F.3d 853, 855-56 (7th Cir. 1996) teaches that the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act's amendments to Section 1915 are inapplicable to petitioners seeking federal habeas relief, as Edwards has.

All further references to Title 28's provisions will simply take the form "Section ___."

Hence the entire portion of the Order that (1) holds Edwards responsible for paying $455 in appellate filings fees, (2) assesses Edwards an initial fee of $32.60 in that regard and (3) orders the trust fund officer at Pinckneyville Correctional Center ("Pinckneyville," where Edwards is serving his prison term) to collect that initial fee or fee installments thereafter is vacated. Accordingly the Clerk of this District Court is ordered to send a copy of this corrective order to the Pinckneyville trust fund officer.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Austin

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Mar 4, 2008
No. 07 C 7196 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 4, 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Austin

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. XAVIER EDWARDS, Petitioner, v. DAN…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division

Date published: Mar 4, 2008

Citations

No. 07 C 7196 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 4, 2008)