From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Arnold

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Aug 8, 2022
3:05-CR-00046-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 2022)

Opinion

3:05-CR-00046-RJC-DSC

08-08-2022

USA v. CURTIS ARNOLD (2)


ORDER

ROBERT J. CONRAD, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

THIS MATTER is before the Court upon another motion of the defendant pro se for a reduction of sentence under the First Step Act of 2018. (Doc. No. 179).

On November 24, 2019, the Court denied his previous motion brought under the Act, (Doc. No. 155), after a complete review of the merits, (Doc. No. 157: Order). Accordingly, the Court may not entertain in the instant motion. Pub. L. 115-135 § 404(c) (2018) (“No court shall entertain a motion made under this section [404] to reduce a sentence ... if a previous motion made under this section to reduce the sentence was, after the date of enactment of this Act [December 21, 2018], denied after a complete review of the motion on the merits.”)

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the defendant's successive motion, (Doc. No. 179), is DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Arnold

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Aug 8, 2022
3:05-CR-00046-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 2022)
Case details for

U.S. v. Arnold

Case Details

Full title:USA v. CURTIS ARNOLD (2)

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: Aug 8, 2022

Citations

3:05-CR-00046-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 2022)