From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Armstrong

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 29, 2009
352 F. App'x 831 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 09-6369.

Submitted: July 23, 2009.

Decided: July 29, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (7:03-cr-00107-F-1).

David Lyndon Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se.

Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


David Lyndon Armstrong appeals the district court's order denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Armstrong, No. 7:03-cr-00107-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Armstrong

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 29, 2009
352 F. App'x 831 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Armstrong

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Lyndon ARMSTRONG…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jul 29, 2009

Citations

352 F. App'x 831 (4th Cir. 2009)