From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Araujo

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Jun 10, 2008
Case No. 3:08mj63/MD (N.D. Fla. Jun. 10, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 3:08mj63/MD.

June 10, 2008


ORDER


Your document, Motion to Continue (document 9), was referred to the undersigned with the following deficiencies:

The document does not have a Certificate of Service as required by Rule 5(b) and (d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, showing proper service via email.
Counsel for the moving party shall confer with counsel for the opposing party and shall file with the court, at the time of filing a motion, a statement certifying that counsel has conferred with counsel for the opposing party in a good-faith effort to resolve by agreement the issues raised or has attempted to so confer but, for good cause stated, was unsuccessful, as required by N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 7.1(B).

For these reasons, IT IS ORDERED that:

XXX The document shall remain in the electronic file, but the court will not consider it until you have corrected the above deficiencies through the filing of a corrected document. The document is denied without prejudice with leave given to refile after correction.
The document shall remain in the electronic file, but no further pleadings will be accepted unless they comply with NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA local rules.
Other:

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Araujo

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Jun 10, 2008
Case No. 3:08mj63/MD (N.D. Fla. Jun. 10, 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Araujo

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CASIMIRO GUSTAVO ARAUJO

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Jun 10, 2008

Citations

Case No. 3:08mj63/MD (N.D. Fla. Jun. 10, 2008)