From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Applewhite

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 2, 2010
368 F. App'x 790 (9th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-30221.

Submitted February 16, 2010.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed March 2, 2010.

Jeffrey S. Sweet, Assistant U.S., Office of U.S. Attorney, Eugene, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Bryan E. Lessley, Assistant Federal Public Defender, FPDOR — Federal Public Defender's Office, Eugene, OR, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Michael R. Hogan, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. 6:08-CR-60037-MRH.

Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Willie David Applewhite appeals from the district court's denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment for lack of jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Applewhite contends that the federal bank robbery statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), lacks a sufficient nexus to interstate commerce because the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation does not insure banks against theft or robbery, and therefore bank robberies do not cause any loss to the federal government. This contention lacks merit. See United States v. Blajos, 292 F.3d 1068, 1071-72 (9th Cir. 2002); United States v. Harris, 108 F.3d 1107, 1109 (9th Cir. 1997).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Applewhite

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 2, 2010
368 F. App'x 790 (9th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Applewhite

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Willie David APPLEWHITE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 2, 2010

Citations

368 F. App'x 790 (9th Cir. 2010)