From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Anderson

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Feb 28, 2024
3:20-CR-00385-RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Feb. 28, 2024)

Opinion

3:20-CR-00385-RJC-DCK

02-28-2024

USA v. LATISHA ANDERSON (7)


ORDER

Robert J. Conrad, Jr. United States District Judge

THIS MATTER is before the Court upon motion of the defendant pro se for a reduction of sentence based on Amendment 821 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines relating to certain zero-point offenders. (Doc. No. 385).

Part B, Subpart 1 of the Amendment is retroactive and created a two-level decrease if a defendant meets all the criteria in USSG §4C1.1(a). USSG §1B1.10(d), comment. (n.7). Here, the defendant was assessed one criminal history point for communicating threats in 2010. (Doc. No. 187: Presentence Report ¶ 43). Accordingly, she is not eligible for relief. USSG § 4C1.1(a)(1).

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the defendant's motion is DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Anderson

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Feb 28, 2024
3:20-CR-00385-RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Feb. 28, 2024)
Case details for

U.S. v. Anderson

Case Details

Full title:USA v. LATISHA ANDERSON (7)

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: Feb 28, 2024

Citations

3:20-CR-00385-RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Feb. 28, 2024)