From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Allen

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Winchester
Mar 25, 2009
No. 4:08-cr-40 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 25, 2009)

Opinion

No. 4:08-cr-40.

March 25, 2009


ORDER


United States Magistrate Judge Susan K. Lee filed her report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (c) and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 59(a). [Court Doc. 20.] Neither party filed objections within the given 10 days.

After reviewing the record, the Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Lee's report and recommendation. The Court thus ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Lee's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations pursuant to § 636(b)(1) and Rule 59(a).

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that the Motion and Memorandum to Suppress [Court Doc. 13] and the Supplement to Memorandum to Suppress [Court Doc. 19] be DENIED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Allen

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Winchester
Mar 25, 2009
No. 4:08-cr-40 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 25, 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Allen

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NATHANIEL ALLEN

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Winchester

Date published: Mar 25, 2009

Citations

No. 4:08-cr-40 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 25, 2009)

Citing Cases

United States v. Hinnard

Rolley, 2017 WL 2312697, at *2 (holding officer “had probable cause to believe [the defendant] was under the…