From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Alexander

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 25, 2011
412 F. App'x 598 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 10-6505.

Submitted: February 2, 2011.

Decided: February 25, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:03-cr-00321-AW-6; 8:08-cv-03045-AW).

Michael Lawlor, Lawlor Englert, LLC, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant. Adam Kenneth Ake, Office of the United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Adrian Alexander seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Alexander has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Alexander

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 25, 2011
412 F. App'x 598 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Alexander

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adrian ALEXANDER, a/k/a…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 25, 2011

Citations

412 F. App'x 598 (4th Cir. 2011)