From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Adviento

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Jun 16, 2009
CASE NO. 8:07CR397 (D. Neb. Jun. 16, 2009)

Summary

explaining the defendant met neither prong of Strickland where the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into his plea agreement that included a waiver of his right to file a motion for downward departure or request a variance

Summary of this case from Dominguez v. United States

Opinion

CASE NO. 8:07CR397.

June 16, 2009


JUDGMENT


In accordance with the accompanying memorandum and order,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Court has completed the initial review of the Defendant's Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (Filing No. 66);

2. Upon initial review, the Court summarily dismisses the Defendant's claims raised in the § 2255 motion;

3. The Defendant's motion for leave to proceed in pauperis (Filing No. 67) is denied as moot; and

4. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this judgment to the Defendant at his last-known address.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Adviento

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Jun 16, 2009
CASE NO. 8:07CR397 (D. Neb. Jun. 16, 2009)

explaining the defendant met neither prong of Strickland where the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into his plea agreement that included a waiver of his right to file a motion for downward departure or request a variance

Summary of this case from Dominguez v. United States
Case details for

U.S. v. Adviento

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DANA ADVIENTO, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Jun 16, 2009

Citations

CASE NO. 8:07CR397 (D. Neb. Jun. 16, 2009)

Citing Cases

Dominguez v. United States

Where a defense attorney adheres to the terms of the plea agreement that expressly prevent him from seeking a…