From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Adamic

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 27, 2005
No. CR S-02-0430 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2005)

Opinion

No. CR S-02-0430 FCD GGH P.

September 27, 2005


ORDER


Respondent seeks, by motion filed on September 20, 2005, an order finding that movant has waived his attorney-client privilege with various counsel: Caro Marks, Matthew Bockmon, and Jan Karowsky, with respect to work they did for him before and during his change of plea and during the sentencing phase of his case, as well as with respect to any and all communications between each counsel and movant related "to the plea agreement, the factual basis, defendant's preparation and any advisements concerning his entry of plea and sentencing, the presentence report, defenses, discovery, the evidence, witness statements, pretrial and presentencing research and investigation, departures and reasons for departures, and defendant's exposure to prison time had he chosen to proceed to trial."

Movant Adamic is now directed to show cause, by October 7, 2005, why the motion of the United States of America should not be granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Adamic

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 27, 2005
No. CR S-02-0430 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2005)
Case details for

United States v. Adamic

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, v. JAMES EDWARD ADAMIC, Movant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 27, 2005

Citations

No. CR S-02-0430 FCD GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2005)