From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Acuna-Chavez

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Brownsville Division
Jan 27, 2006
CRIMINAL NO. B-02-391, CRIMINAL NO. B-02-519 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 27, 2006)

Opinion

CRIMINAL NO. B-02-391, CRIMINAL NO. B-02-519.

January 27, 2006


ORDER


Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 38, in the above-referenced cause of action. After a de novo review of the file, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED.

It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendant's Motion for the Court to Intervene, Dkt. No. 36, is DENIED, and Defendant's Request for Clarification of Judgment, Dkt. No. 37, is DENIED.

Furthermore, for substantially the same reasons as those outlined in the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation, Defendant's Motion to Court for Error in Judgment and Order that B.O.P. Has Construed, For Oversight and Omission, Pursuant to Rule 36 [sic] is DENIED. Dkt. No. 39.

DONE at Brownsville, Texas, this 27th day of January, 2006.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Acuna-Chavez

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Brownsville Division
Jan 27, 2006
CRIMINAL NO. B-02-391, CRIMINAL NO. B-02-519 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 27, 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Acuna-Chavez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JAVIER ACUNA-CHAVEZ, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Brownsville Division

Date published: Jan 27, 2006

Citations

CRIMINAL NO. B-02-391, CRIMINAL NO. B-02-519 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 27, 2006)