Opinion
CRIMINAL NO. B-02-391, CRIMINAL NO. B-02-519.
January 27, 2006
ORDER
Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 38, in the above-referenced cause of action. After a de novo review of the file, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED.
It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendant's Motion for the Court to Intervene, Dkt. No. 36, is DENIED, and Defendant's Request for Clarification of Judgment, Dkt. No. 37, is DENIED.
Furthermore, for substantially the same reasons as those outlined in the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation, Defendant's Motion to Court for Error in Judgment and Order that B.O.P. Has Construed, For Oversight and Omission, Pursuant to Rule 36 [sic] is DENIED. Dkt. No. 39.
DONE at Brownsville, Texas, this 27th day of January, 2006.