From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. 3814 NW Thurman Street

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 2, 1999
172 F.3d 689 (9th Cir. 1999)

Summary

holding that the forfeiture of proceeds from false loan applications constitutes punishment

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Jalaram, Inc.

Opinion

No. 97-35054

April 2, 1999

Before: Ferdinand F. Fernandez, Pamela Ann Rymer and A. Wallace Tashima, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

The opinion filed January 5, 1999, 164 F.3d 1191, is amended by adding a new footnote 5 at the end of the second full paragraph, right-hand column, 164 F.3d at 1198, as follows:

5. Our analysis in this Section III.C is necessarily based on the facts in the record before us. We do not intend for the above factual analysis to serve as findings of fact or as law of the case or to preclude further development of the record on remand to the district court.

Former footnote 5 is renumbered as footnote 6.

With the above amendments, the government's petition for rehearing is denied.


Summaries of

United States v. 3814 NW Thurman Street

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 2, 1999
172 F.3d 689 (9th Cir. 1999)

holding that the forfeiture of proceeds from false loan applications constitutes punishment

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Jalaram, Inc.
Case details for

United States v. 3814 NW Thurman Street

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 3814 NW THURMAN STREET…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 2, 1999

Citations

172 F.3d 689 (9th Cir. 1999)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Jalaram, Inc.

This claim is simply false. See, e.g., United States v. Browne, 505 F.3d 1229, 1281-82 (11th Cir. 2007)…

U.S. v. Ahmad

However, Bajakajian, in recognizing that instrumentalities can be forfeited in civil in rem proceedings…