U.S. Magnesium, LLC v. ATI Titanium, LLC

2 Citing cases

  1. Frazier v. Eagle Air Med Corp.

    2:22-CV-00300-TS-DAO (D. Utah Aug. 27, 2024)

    There is no evidence in the record to indicate Dr. Luke's testimony is not “scientifically sound” such that it does not “sufficiently satisfy Rule 702's reliability requirements.”U.S. Magnesium, LLC v. ATI Titanium, LLC, No. 2:17-cv-00923-HCN-JCB, 2021 WL 615412, at *3 (D. Utah Feb. 17, 2021). Truck Ins. Exch., 360 F.3d at 1210.

  2. Armstrong v. Sabin

    Case No. 2:20-CV-261-TS-DAO (D. Utah Apr. 19, 2021)   Cited 3 times

    These can be flushed out through cross-examination at the valuation hearing, so the Court will deny the Motion without prejudice as to the remaining objections. See U.S. Magnesium, LLC v. Ati Titanium, LLC, No. 2:17-cv-00923-HCN-JCB, 2021 WL 615412, at *3 (D. Utah Feb. 17, 2021) ("[I]f determining 'reliability' requires the court to decide which party's facts are more believable, then the court cannot exclude the expert but must leave it to the fact finder to determine the facts and how much weight to afford the expert's testimony based on that factual determination."). --------