From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

US Inventor, Inc. v. Vidal

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nov 28, 2022
No. 2021-2212 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 28, 2022)

Opinion

2021-2212

11-28-2022

US INVENTOR, INC., TINNUS ENTERPRISES, LLC, 360 HEROS, INC, RAMZI MAALOUF, LARRY GOLDEN, WORLD SOURCE ENTERPRISES, LLC, E-WATCH, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Defendant-Appellee


This order is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 2:21-cv-00047-JRG, Chief Judge J. Rodney Gilstrap.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Upon consideration of the appellants' unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to Rule 42 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the parties' joint response to the court's November 8, 2022, order, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted to the extent that the appeal is withdrawn. (2) The parties shall bear their own costs. FOR THE COURT


Summaries of

US Inventor, Inc. v. Vidal

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Nov 28, 2022
No. 2021-2212 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 28, 2022)
Case details for

US Inventor, Inc. v. Vidal

Case Details

Full title:US INVENTOR, INC., TINNUS ENTERPRISES, LLC, 360 HEROS, INC, RAMZI MAALOUF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 28, 2022

Citations

No. 2021-2212 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 28, 2022)

Citing Cases

US Inventor, Inc. v. United States Patent & Trademark Office

Inventor expressed that same position in a lawsuit it filed in 2021 in the U.S. District Court for the…