From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. Forest Serv. v. Cottonwood Envtl. Law Ctr.

Supreme Court of the United States
Oct 11, 2016
137 S. Ct. 293 (2016)

Summary

holding that FWS's expansion of critical habitat required the Forest Service to reinitiate consultation

Summary of this case from Friends of the River v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv.

Opinion

No. 15–1387.

10-11-2016

UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, et al., petitioners, v. COTTONWOOD ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER.


Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.


Summaries of

U.S. Forest Serv. v. Cottonwood Envtl. Law Ctr.

Supreme Court of the United States
Oct 11, 2016
137 S. Ct. 293 (2016)

holding that FWS's expansion of critical habitat required the Forest Service to reinitiate consultation

Summary of this case from Friends of the River v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv.
Case details for

U.S. Forest Serv. v. Cottonwood Envtl. Law Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, et al., petitioners, v. COTTONWOOD…

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Oct 11, 2016

Citations

137 S. Ct. 293 (2016)
196 L. Ed. 2d 213

Citing Cases

All. for the Wild Rockies v. Savage

In light of these developments, Alliance argued that the Forest Service could not properly rely on the Lynx…

Friends of the River v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv.

Reinitiation is also required when an identified action is subsequently modified in a manner the BiOp did not…