U.S. ex Rel. Salazar v. Liebach

1 Citing case

  1. Saud v. DePaul Univ.

    19 CV 3945 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 6, 2024)

    But Saud does not direct the Court to any contradiction, and the Court found none relevant to these motions. See U.S. ex rel. Salazar v. Liebach, 2002 WL 31253890, at *10 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 4, 2002) (“An undeveloped argument speaks to its paucity and the court may refuse to consider it” (citing United States v. Jones, 224 F.3d 621, 626 (7th Cir. 2000))).