From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. ex Rel. Piacentile v. CVS Corporation

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Oct 4, 2007
04 CV 1471 (CBK) (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 4, 2007)

Opinion

04 CV 1471 (CBK).

October 4, 2007


ORDER


This is an action brought by plaintiff Joseph Piacentile pursuant to the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act, 31. U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., to recover damages and civil penalties on behalf of the United States of America and several states. On August 29, 2007, the United States provided notice that it would decline to exercise its statutory right to intervene. In that notice, the government referred the Court to 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(1), which provides that an action may be maintained in the name of the United States provided that the "action may be dismissed only if the court and the Attorney General give written consent to the dismissal and their reasons for consenting." Id.

On August 31, 2007, plaintiff provided notice of dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1). Subsequently, on September 14, 2007, the government filed a letter with the Court providing its consent to the dismissal. Therein, the government explained that pursuit of this action is not in its best interests, because its investigation had revealed that there was insufficient evidence of the alleged wrongdoing to warrant litigation. The Court is satisfied with the government's explanation. Accordingly, pursuant to plaintiff's notice of dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1), the Court hereby dismisses this action without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. ex Rel. Piacentile v. CVS Corporation

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Oct 4, 2007
04 CV 1471 (CBK) (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 4, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. ex Rel. Piacentile v. CVS Corporation

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. JOSEPH PIACENTILE, Plaintiff, v. CVS…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Oct 4, 2007

Citations

04 CV 1471 (CBK) (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 4, 2007)