Opinion
Case No. C 10-03724 CW (LB)
05-14-2013
U.S. ETHERNET INNOVATIONS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ACER, INC., et al., Defendants. and ATHEROS COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et al., Intervenor,
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR Jason H. Liss Attorneys for Intervenor BROADCOM CORPORATION CARR, McCLELLAN, INGERSOLL, THOMPSON & HORN Professional Law Corporation Scott E. Atkinson Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant PARALLEL TECHNOLOGY, LLC
Robert A. Bleicher (Bar No. 111334)
Scott E. Atkinson (Bar No. 251996)
satkinson@carr-mcclellan.com
CARR, McCLELLAN, INGERSOLL, THOMPSON & HORN
Professional Law Corporation
216 Park Road
P.O. Box 513
Burlingame, California 94011-0513
Telephone: (650) 342-9600
Facsimile: (650) 342-7685
Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant
PARALLEL TECHNOLOGY, LLC
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
CHANGING TIME TO RESPOND TO
BROADCOM'S THIRD PARTY
COMPLAINT AGAINST PARALLEL
TECHNOLOGY, LLC
WHEREAS Intervenor Broadcom Corporation ("Broadcom") filed a First Amended Complaint in Intervention and Third-Party Complaint Against Parallel Technology, LLC on April 18, 2013 (Docket No. 735) (the "Third Party Complaint");
WHEREAS Parallel Technology, LLC ("Parallel") was served with the Third Party Complaint on April 29, 2013;
WHEREAS Parallel recently retained Carr, McClellan, Ingersoll, Thompson & Horn Professional Law Corporation ("Carr") to represent it in this action, more than a week after Parallel was served;
WHEREAS Carr needs time to review the state of the voluminous docket in this matter before responding to the Third Party Complaint;
WHEREAS counsel at Carr has pre-paid travel arrangements between now and the currently scheduled deadline to respond to Broadcom's Third Party Complaint;
WHEREAS BROADCOM AND PARALLEL HEREBY STIPULATE that Parallel shall have until May 30, 2013 to respond to Broadcom's Third Party Complaint.
WHEREAS the Court's April 18, 2013 Order requests that any motions to dismiss be noticed "to the extent possible" to be heard on June 27, 2013;
WHEREAS the Local Rules provide for a 35 day notice period on noticed motions;
THEREFORE, Broadcom and Parallel request a stipulated order changing the time to permit Parallel to have until May 30, 2013 to respond to Broadcom's Third Party Complaint, and, in the event that Parallel files a motion in response, permitting Broadcom to have until June 13, 2013 to oppose, and permitting Parallel to have until June 20, 2013 to reply to Broadcom's opposition. Broadcom and Parallel further request that the Court, if it so wishes, waive the 35-day notice period provided by Local Rule such that it may hear any such motion on June 27, 2013.
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND
DORR
By: ____________________________
Jason H. Liss
Attorneys for Intervenor
BROADCOM CORPORATION
CARR, McCLELLAN, INGERSOLL,
THOMPSON & HORN
Professional Law Corporation
By: ____________________________
Scott E. Atkinson
Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant
PARALLEL TECHNOLOGY, LLC
Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X(B), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from all signatories.
____________________________
Scott E. Atkinson
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, except: Parallel has until May 30, 2013 to respond to Broadcom's Third Party Complaint, and, in the event that Parallel files a motion in response, Broadcom has until June 11, 2013 to oppose, Parallel has until June 17, 2013 to reply to Broadcom's opposition; and the motion will be hear on June 27, 2013.
____________________________
United States District Court Judge