Opinion
2:23-cv-01307-GMN-NJK
10-30-2024
ORDER
[DOCKET NO. 36]
Nancy J. Koppe, United States Magistrate Judge
Pending before the Court is the EEOC's motion to compel discovery. Docket No. 36. The I motion relates to discovery propounded ten months ago, responses provided nine months ago, and 5 a meet-and-confer that appears to have run its course more than five months ago. See, e.g., Docket No. 36 at 4. No explanation is provided as to how this motion is timely given the pertinent 7 considerations. See, e.g., Herndon v. City of Henderson, 507 F.Supp.3d 1243, 1247-48 (D. Nev. 1 2020). Accordingly, the motion to compel is DENIED without prejudice.
The Court may sua sponte raise the potential untimeliness of a motion to compel. Garcia * v. Serv. Emps. Int'l Union, 332 F.R.D. 351, 354 n.2 (D. Nev. 2019).
IT IS SO ORDERED.