From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. Dist. Court for the Eastern Dist. of California v. Sanchez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 12, 2011
No. CRS 10-473-WBS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2011)

Opinion

No. CRS 10-473-WBS

08-12-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FABIAN PINEDA SANCHEZ, SALVADOR GARCIA MONDRAGON. TOURINO GARCIA MONDRAGON, Defendants.

DINA L. SANTOS, Bar #204200 A Professional Law Corporation Attorney for Defendant SALVADOR MONDRAGON


DINA L. SANTOS, Bar #204200

A Professional Law Corporation

Attorney for Defendant

SALVADOR MONDRAGON

STIPULATION AND ORDER VACATING

DATE, CONTINUING CASE, AND

EXCLUDING TIME

Date: October 17, 2011

Time: 8:30 a.m.

Judge: Hon. Shubb

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney HEIKO COPPOLA, Counsel for Plaintiff, and Attorney Dina L. Santos, Counsel for Defendant SALVADOR GARCIA MONDRAGON, and Attorney Gilbert Roque, Counsel for Defendant FABIAN PINEDA SANCHZ; Attorney Clemente Jiminez, Counsel for Defendant TOURINO GARCIA MONDRAGON, that the status conference scheduled for August 12, 2011, be vacated and the matter be continued to this Court's criminal calendar on October 17, 2011, at 8:30 a.m., for further status.

This continuance is requested by the defense in order to permit further diligent examination of possible defenses, further client consultation concerning available courses of action, and review of discovery. Although some investigation has been done by the defense, a significant amount of investigation remains to be performed that will impact whether the case proceeds on to trial.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that time for trial under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 et. seq. be tolled pursuant to §

3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv), Local code T-4 (time to prepare), and that the ends of justice served in granting the continuance and allowing the defendant further time to prepare outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

The Court is advised that all counsel have conferred about this request, that they have agreed to the October 17, 2011 date, and that all counsel have authorized Ms. Santos to sign this stipulation on their behalf.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DINA L. SANTOS

Attorney for Defendant

SALVADOR GARCIA MONDRAGON

GILBERT ROQUE

Attorney for Defendant

FABIAN PINEDA SANCHEZ

CLEMENTE JIMINEZ

Attorney for Defendant

TOURINO GARCIA MONDRAGON

HEIKO COPPOLA

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

By the Court,

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

U.S. Dist. Court for the Eastern Dist. of California v. Sanchez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 12, 2011
No. CRS 10-473-WBS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2011)
Case details for

U.S. Dist. Court for the Eastern Dist. of California v. Sanchez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FABIAN PINEDA SANCHEZ, SALVADOR…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 12, 2011

Citations

No. CRS 10-473-WBS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2011)