From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. Department of Labor v. R.M. International

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Mar 28, 2011
09-CV-863-HU (D. Or. Mar. 28, 2011)

Opinion

09-CV-863-HU.

March 28, 2011

BRUCE L. BROWN, EVAN H. NORDBY, United States Department of Labor, Office of the Solicitor, Seattle, Wash, Attorneys for Plaintiff.

RICHARD N. VAN CLEAVE, TODD A. HACKETT, Portland, OR, Attorneys for Defendants.


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Dennis James Hubel issued Findings and Recommendation (#55) on March 3, 2011, in which he recommends this Court deny Defendants' Motion (#24) for Summary Judgment. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) ( en banc). See also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Hubel's Findings and Recommendation (#55). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendants' Motion (#24) for Summary Judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. Department of Labor v. R.M. International

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Mar 28, 2011
09-CV-863-HU (D. Or. Mar. 28, 2011)
Case details for

U.S. Department of Labor v. R.M. International

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Plaintiff, v. R.M. INTERNATIONAL, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division

Date published: Mar 28, 2011

Citations

09-CV-863-HU (D. Or. Mar. 28, 2011)