U.S. Boring & Tunneling, Inc. v. Proc Robinson Enterprises, Inc.

Full title: U.S. BORING AND TUNNELING, INC., APPELLANT, v. PROC ROBINSON ENTERPRISES…

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Mar 18, 1994

633 So. 2d 118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-874.

March 18, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County; R. James Stroker, Judge.

John W. Frost, II and Neal L. O'Toole of Frost O'Toole, P.A., Bartow, for appellant.

Robert S. Hayes, Kissimmee, and C. Robert Schaub, Huntington, WV, for appellees PROC Robinson Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Robinson Const. Co., Inc. and Intern. Fidelity Ins. Co.

No appearance for appellee City of St. Cloud.

PER CURIAM.

U.S. Boring and Tunneling, Inc. appeals the final judgment in favor of Proc Robinson Enterprises, Inc. (Robinson) following the trial court's grant of Robinson's motion for directed verdict. We reverse because the trial court failed to consider the "changed conditions" clause of the contract. See Town of Longboat Key v. Carl E. Widell Son, 362 So.2d 719 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). See also Hendry Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 18 Fla. L. Weekly D2301, 1993 WL 431973 (Fla. 3d DCA Oct. 26, 1993). We remand for a new trial.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

W. SHARP, GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.