From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. Bank v. Tiburcio

Supreme Court of New York
Nov 30, 2021
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 72249 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2021)

Opinion

Index No. 32237/17E Appeal No. 14715 No. 2021-06662 No. 2021-01862

11-30-2021

U.S. Bank National Association, Not in its Individual Capacity but Solely as Trustee for the RMAC Trust, Series 2016-CTT, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Felix M. Tiburcio, et al., Defendants. Grant Ave Bronx Realty Corp., Defendant-Appellant. Index No. 32237/17E Appeal No. 14715

The Rosenfeld Law Office, Lawrence (Avinoam Rosenfeld of counsel), for appellant. Gross Polowy, LLC, Westbury (Stephen J. Vargas of counsel), for respondent.


The Rosenfeld Law Office, Lawrence (Avinoam Rosenfeld of counsel), for appellant.

Gross Polowy, LLC, Westbury (Stephen J. Vargas of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Renwick, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moulton, Scarpulla, Higgitt, JJ.

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Doris Gonzalez, J.), entered on May 8, 2020, which granted, on default, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

Defendant's failure to submit timely papers in opposition to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, or obtain permission to submit late papers, constituted a default on the motion for which its remedy is not an appeal but a motion to vacate the default (see CPLR 5511; Shannon v City of New York, 275 A.D.2d 671 [1st Dept 2000]; Masone v New York City Hous. Auth., 279 A.D.2d 323 [1st Dept 2001]). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

U.S. Bank v. Tiburcio

Supreme Court of New York
Nov 30, 2021
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 72249 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2021)
Case details for

U.S. Bank v. Tiburcio

Case Details

Full title:U.S. Bank National Association, Not in its Individual Capacity but Solely…

Court:Supreme Court of New York

Date published: Nov 30, 2021

Citations

2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 72249 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2021)