Opinion
2:19-cv-00584-JCM-NJK
12-19-2022
U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE TO WACHOVIA BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF THE MLMI TRUST, MORTGAGE LOAN ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-A8, Plaintiff, v. FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP, Darren T. Brenner, Nevada Bar No.8386, Lindsay D. Dragon, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 13474, Attorneys for Plaintiff, U.S. Bank, National Association, as Successor Trustee to Wachovia Bank, N.A., as Trustee for the Certificateholders of the MLMI Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-A8. SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP, Kevin S. Sinclair, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12277, Attorney for Defendant, Fidelity National Title Insurance Company.
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP, Darren T. Brenner, Nevada Bar No.8386, Lindsay D. Dragon, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 13474, Attorneys for Plaintiff, U.S. Bank, National Association, as Successor Trustee to Wachovia Bank, N.A., as Trustee for the Certificateholders of the MLMI Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-A8.
SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP, Kevin S. Sinclair, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12277, Attorney for Defendant, Fidelity National Title Insurance Company.
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME PERIOD TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF NO. 40] [FIRST REQUEST]
Plaintiff, U.S. Bank, National Association, as Successor Trustee to Wachovia Bank, N.A., as Trustee for the Certificateholders of the MLMI Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-A8 (“U.S. Bank”) and Defendant Fidelity National Title Insurance Company (“Fidelity”), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1. On November 4, 2022, U.S. Bank filed its First Amended Complaint [ECF No. 37];
2. On December, 5, 2022, Fidelity filed a Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 40];
3. U.S. Bank's deadline to respond to Fidelity's Motion to Dismiss is currently December, 19, 2022;
4. U.S. Bank's counsel is requesting an extension until Friday, January 6, 2023, to file its response to the pending Motion to Dismiss;
5. This extension is requested to allow counsel for U.S. Bank additional time to review and respond to the points and authorities cited to in the pending Motions;
6. Counsel for Fidelity does not oppose the requested extension;
7. This is the first request for an extension which is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.