Opinion
2:19-CV-00584-JCM-NJK
02-16-2023
SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP KEVIN S. SINCLAIR Attorneys for Defendant FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP LINDSAY D. DRAGON Attorneys for Plaintiff U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP
KEVIN S. SINCLAIR
Attorneys for Defendant
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
LINDSAY D. DRAGON
Attorneys for Plaintiff U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO REPLY IN SUPPORT OF FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY'S MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 40)
[SECOND REQUEST]
THE HON. JAMES C. MAHAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
COME NOW defendant Fidelity National Title Insurance Company (“Fidelity”) and plaintiff U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”) (jointly, “Parties”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, which hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
1. On November 4, 2022, U.S. Bank filed its first amended complaint in the United States District Court, District of Nevada;
2. On December 5, 2022, Fidelity moved to dismiss U.S. Bank's first amended complaint (ECF No. 40);
3. On January 18, 2023, U.S. Bank filed its response to Fidelity's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 52);
4. On January 25, 2023, the Court granted the parties' first stipulation to extend the time for Fidelity to file its reply (ECF No. 54), setting a deadline to reply of February 27, 2023;
5. Counsel for Fidelity are requesting a 14-day extension of its deadline to file its reply supporting its motion to dismiss, through and including Monday, March 13, 2023, to afford Fidelity additional time to respond to the arguments advanced by U.S. Bank.
6. Counsel for U.S. Bank does not oppose the requested extension;
7. This is the second request for an extension made by counsel for Fidelity, which is made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay.
IT IS SO STIPULATED that Fidelity's deadline to file its reply to its motion to dismiss is hereby extended through and including March 13, 2023.
IT IS SO ORDERED.