Opinion
2:20-cv-01955-KJD-VCF
10-17-2023
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE, SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF BEAR STEARNS ASSET BACKED SECURITIES I LLC, ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-HE6, Plaintiff, v. FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE GROUP, INC.; FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY; DOE INDIVIDUALS I through X; and ROE CORPORATIONS XI through XX, inclusive, Defendants.
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP Lindsay D. Dragon, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13474 Attorneys for Plaintiff SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP Kevin Sinclair, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12277 Attorneys for Defendants
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
Lindsay D. Dragon, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13474
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP
Kevin Sinclair, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12277
Attorneys for Defendants
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIDELITY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 72]
Plaintiff, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Successor in Interest to Bank of America, National Association as Successor by Merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee for Certificateholders of Bear Steams Asset Backed Securities I LLC, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-HE6 (“U.S. Bank”) and Defendant Fidelity National Title Insurance Company (“Fidelity”), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1. On September 25, 2023, Fidelity filed a Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 72] (“Motion”);
2. U.S. Bank's deadline to respond to Fidelity's Motion is currently October 16, 2023;
3. On October 12, 2023, the Nevada Supreme Court issued its opinion in Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, Case No. 84161, 139 Nev. Ad. Op. 45 (Oct. 12, 2023) Deutsche Bank Opinion”). The Deutsche Bank Opinion addresses the arguments in this matter; however, U.S. Bank need additional time to analyze the Deutsche Bank Opinion and determine next steps;
4. U.S. Bank's counsel is therefore requesting a thirty-day extension until Wednesday, November 15, 2023, to file its response to the pending Motion;
5. Counsel for Fidelity does not oppose the requested extension;
6. This is the first request for an extension which is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.